Exploring the Role of Cushion Gases in Hydrogen Storage Efficiency

Exploring the Role of Cushion Gases in Hydrogen Storage Efficiency

2025-11-10 technology

London, Monday, 10 November 2025.
A recent review highlights how cushion gases affect hydrogen storage efficiency, impacting plume migration and trapping potential. This is crucial for advancing hydrogen storage amid climate change challenges.

Cushion Gas Influence on Hydrogen Storage

The recent review delves into the impact of cushion gases like nitrogen (N2), methane (CH4), and carbon dioxide (CO2) on hydrogen storage efficiency. These gases are crucial as they maintain formation pressure and enhance the deliverability of hydrogen during the withdrawal process. I found it fascinating that the composition of cushion gas can significantly affect the purity of the hydrogen extracted, which is vital for maintaining the energy’s quality [1].

Challenges and Opportunities in Underground Hydrogen Storage

Subsurface geological formations such as depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs, saline aquifers, and salt caverns offer promising options for large-scale hydrogen storage. However, the interaction of cushion gases with underground environments poses challenges. The dynamics of gas/brine/rock systems and their wettability are pivotal in understanding how these systems can efficiently store and release hydrogen. This complexity needs further study to optimise the use of underground storage for hydrogen [1][2].

Hydrogen’s Role in a Sustainable Future

Hydrogen is increasingly seen as a key player in the global transition to cleaner energy. By 2030, hydrogen demand is projected to rise significantly, underscoring the need for efficient storage solutions. As hydrogen does not emit carbon when burned, it is a favourable alternative to fossil fuels, aligning with global goals to reduce greenhouse gas emissions [1][3].

Future Directions in Hydrogen Storage Research

Research indicates that the use of cushion gases can improve hydrogen recovery efficiency. However, systematic comparisons of different gas types under identical conditions are lacking. This gap presents an opportunity for future research to innovate and refine hydrogen storage technologies, ensuring they meet the demands of an evolving energy landscape [1].

Bronnen


hydrogen storage cushion gas